Windows 95? Don’t be absurd. Windows 2.1Where is the inspiration from? Windows 95?! The skeuomorphic design of the buttons isn’t bringing back retro vibes for me. It’s just ugly.
The new buttons absolutely blow my mind. Was there not a single person on the testing team or the UI team that said, "Hey, maybe these three buttons up here don't look that great." or "Hey, maybe we shouldn't move the volume control indicator down to a spot where you can't keep your eyes on the road."Where is the inspiration from? Windows 95?! The skeuomorphic design of the buttons isn’t bringing back retro vibes for me. It’s just ugly.
If you think the 4.1.2 Sync 4 UI is ugly, you should see the latest UI for the market leading purveyor of Electronic Medical Records (trust me, your health system uses this piece of garbage). I won’t name the company because they’re privately owned and very adverse to negative comments, but the UI literally looks like cutting edge early 1990s Netscape Navigator. Trust me, there are many worse UIs in critical applications than the latest Sync 4 UI.Where is the inspiration from? Windows 95?! The skeuomorphic design of the buttons isn’t bringing back retro vibes for me. It’s just ugly.
For those who were wondering how bad Windows 2.1 was:Windows 95? Don’t be absurd. Windows 2.1
TWO GIGS OF DISK SPACE IN 1988 ??????For those who were wondering how bad Windows 2.1 was:![]()
It's interesting that just a few months after they moved the volume from the bottom to the top, that they decided to move it back to the bottom again. I really don't care about that as it's more about what I hear than what a number says, but still a sign about indecisiveness.or "Hey, maybe we shouldn't move the volume control indicator down to a spot where you can't keep your eyes on the road."