mikeandrie
Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2023
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 7
- Location
- SF Bay Area
- Vehicles
- 2023 Mach-E Premium RWD; 2013 Fusion Energi
- Thread starter
- #31
But I can just as easily insert all kinds of irrelevant factors to make the comparison biased in favor of Rodrigo. Maybe he has a special needs kid he has to take to the learning center 50 miles away every day. Not good enough? OK, he has FIVE special needs kids, and he has to drive them all to different places hundreds of miles apart every day. Not only that, but he adopted all five special needs kids from an orphanage, thereby saving society from spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in public funding for the children.First, that's John's choice. Financially, 2 people can make 2 very different decisions in life. That's not the burden of society, that's the burden placed on the person who decided to make those decisions. Both are afforded the same opportunity and the same income, so therefore it is apples to apples. Would it have been better if I said that John has a gambling addiction and squanders all of his money? Or how about if John and Rodrigo have the same exact situation but John purchased a home 2x the value of Rodrigo and can barely make ends meat after his mortgage?
Look, I'm being flippant, and I don't mean to be disrespectful, but it seems to me if you have to bias the comparison to make one person sound more sympathetic, you're not really addressing the main point of the debate.
I will readily concede, however, that CAV stickers do not solve the problem of burdens imposed by elderly parents.
Sponsored
Last edited: