SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,223
Reaction score
2,803
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
The problem is that, even if the NHTSA forced them to replace them, the REPLACEMENTS are still failing from time to time. That's what this latest investigation is about.
Have there been any confirmed failures of post-May 22 builds?
Sponsored

 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,947
Reaction score
17,394
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Aside from whether it is right or wrong, I’m not sure everyone submitting a NHTSA complaint is productive. Yes, it might get NHTSA’s initial attention to see so many but if the below is what the investigator is seeing over and over when they follow-up, I’m not sure it helps the cause:
<SNIP>
Submitter #4: Filed complaint on HVBJB. When contacted said he experienced SVS not SSN one year after recall. Manufacturer responds stating recall software effective, this HVBJB sustained some damage pre-recall. As a result, software prevented total failure when issue surfaced, damaged part replaced by manufacturer at no cost to consumer. Based on manufacturer explanation, no further action required at this time.
<SNIP>
I think the people who definitely should be submitting complaints are people with failures post-recall, multiple failures, etc.
Number 4 is why I was hesitant to file a complaint. “Working as intended.” I submitted anyhow, but I think that submissions are best left to those who have experienced a failure requiring replacement of the part (SVS or SSN). ?‍♂?

EDIT: My submission will more than likely make it to the round file. ?‍♂?
 
Last edited:

AKgrampy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
3,528
Reaction score
3,601
Location
Fairbanks, Alaska
Vehicles
Ford Expedition, Ford F-150, Mach E GT
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Have there been any confirmed failures of post-May 22 builds?
Yes there are several instances on the forums of post May 22 builds getting the error and also a few replacement HVBJB failing. No idea of the number. Also no idea if how many were SVS alarms versus SSN alarms.
 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,223
Reaction score
2,803
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
Yes there are several instances on the forums of post May 22 builds getting the error and also a few replacement HVBJB failing. No idea of the number. Also no idea if how many were SVS alarms versus SSN alarms.
By error do you mean the HVB/SVS warnings or the specific BECM DTCs associated with HVBJB failure? I've seen the former, but not the latter on this forum, though I may have missed something. Reason I ask is the question of whether the repair/previous failure is somehow contributing to subsequent failures.
 


Shelbeast

Well-Known Member
First Name
RJ
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
276
Reaction score
128
Location
DMV (MD)
Vehicles
MME GT Delivered 9/9/22, GT500
Occupation
Sausage Maker
Country flag
Mine is in shop now getting new hvbjb.
ford rep called to remind me of ford pass warning. He left message.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,947
Reaction score
17,394
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Mine is in shop now getting new hvbjb.
ford rep called to remind me of ford pass warning. He left message.
Sorry to hear that you blew up your HVBJB. Mine just got dealer-diagnosed (I already pulled the same code). Now we wait for parts. ??
 

JoeSnow

Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Jun 12, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
18
Reaction score
12
Location
USA
Vehicles
Mach-E GT
Country flag
Number 4 is why I was hesitant to file a complaint. “Working as intended.” I submitted anyhow, but I think that submissions are best left to those who have experienced a failure requiring replacement of the part (SVS or SSN). ?‍♂?

EDIT: My submission will more than likely make it to the round file. ?‍♂?
I had the SVS message, reprted to NHTSA, and got contacted by NHTSA for more details.

If some folks are reporting SSN after SVS, then this is still risky.
The software update is fixing the issue only if you are close to a dealership, and this is not how solving the issue should be.
 

Shelbeast

Well-Known Member
First Name
RJ
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
276
Reaction score
128
Location
DMV (MD)
Vehicles
MME GT Delivered 9/9/22, GT500
Occupation
Sausage Maker
Country flag
Sorry to hear that you blew up your HVBJB. Mine just got dealer-diagnosed (I already pulled the same code). Now we wait for parts. ??
Yeah, I felt I was driving same as usual.
 

AKgrampy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
3,528
Reaction score
3,601
Location
Fairbanks, Alaska
Vehicles
Ford Expedition, Ford F-150, Mach E GT
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
By error do you mean the HVB/SVS warnings or the specific BECM DTCs associated with HVBJB failure? I've seen the former, but not the latter on this forum, though I may have missed something. Reason I ask is the question of whether the repair/previous failure is somehow contributing to subsequent failures.
What I mean is people have had their HVBJB replaced on vehicles manufactured after May 22. I just do not know if they have bricked which would be a SSN error or if recall software gave them the SVS error and the vehicle remained drivable. Either way their have been reported cases.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,947
Reaction score
17,394
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Yeah, I felt I was driving same as usual.
I know, right? I got the warning when I engaged my cruise control after getting onto the freeway. ??
 

Mike G

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Mar 27, 2022
Threads
25
Messages
6,458
Reaction score
5,298
Location
N. AL, USA
Vehicles
'23(J1) Mach-E GT-PE, '22 F-150 Lightning, '24 Bronco HLE 2Dr
Country flag
We need those great big shiny "feckoff" contactors like this Mach-E has. Not those wimpy ones with the little dinky pre-pubescent wires. It's embarrassing really. ?‍♂
 

azerik

Well-Known Member
First Name
Erik
Joined
Jan 8, 2023
Threads
79
Messages
4,545
Reaction score
4,558
Location
Chandler/Flagstaff, AZ
Vehicles
'21 Spacey Prem4x, '21 RX450H, 13 Focus EV
Occupation
DevSecNetOps, General PITA
Country flag
If the Lightning HVJB isn't failing.. fit it in the MME.

I think the people who definitely should be submitting complaints are people with failures post-recall, multiple failures, etc.
I think most of them have already dumped the car and moved on. They're sitting on lots somewhere for some luck contestant to purchase.
 

Melancholy1980

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ralph
Joined
Mar 26, 2022
Threads
11
Messages
118
Reaction score
73
Location
West Nyack, NY
Vehicles
2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium Ext AWD Ice White
Country flag
Just in case anyone is wondering, I got curious and googled average time to investigate an NHTSA claim and hooboy we are in for a long and bumpy ride.

“The defects office sets a goal of finishing preliminary investigations in 120 days. When it upgrades those to an engineering analysis, the goal is to finish in a year. But auditors found that preliminary probes in a 2018 and 2019 sample took an average of 617 days to finish. The engineering analyses were open for another 1,001 days on average, almost three times the goal.”

source URL also provides some background that doesn’t make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside about the NHTSA, but at least they’re supposedly on an upswing after their latest improvements.
 

AKgrampy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
3,528
Reaction score
3,601
Location
Fairbanks, Alaska
Vehicles
Ford Expedition, Ford F-150, Mach E GT
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Just in case anyone is wondering, I got curious and googled average time to investigate an NHTSA claim and hooboy we are in for a long and bumpy ride.

“The defects office sets a goal of finishing preliminary investigations in 120 days. When it upgrades those to an engineering analysis, the goal is to finish in a year. But auditors found that preliminary probes in a 2018 and 2019 sample took an average of 617 days to finish. The engineering analyses were open for another 1,001 days on average, almost three times the goal.”

source URL also provides some background that doesn’t make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside about the NHTSA, but at least they’re supposedly on an upswing after their latest improvements.
Which by that time they will have all failed and been changed out under warranty!
Sponsored

 
 







Top