txfab
Member
- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 12
- Location
- Austin, Texas
- Vehicles
- Ford Mach E
- Thread starter
- #1
EV noob here, just got my MME Premium, standard range, AWD... So far, so happy. I already had a 220V plug in the garage which made the transition quite seamless -- I didn't expect the mobile charger to work so well and fast!
I'm curious how people feel about charging. I had read high level that DC fast charging causes battery to degrade faster over time, so I was prepared to use super chargers sparingly.
Then I was surprised that, additionally to that limitation, Ford recommends only charging to 90% as standard practice. And to only go for 100% charge "when I really need the range for a long road trip". That seemed odd and counter-intuitive to me.
Not to mention it causes a really bad aftertaste from EV marketing if you actually only get the "max range" by risking your battery life long-term!
But then I did some research and it turns out that this article from early 2024
https://insideevs.com/news/707538/recharge-ev-after-every-trip-video/
suggests that "Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) can be regularly recharged to 100% without worrying about degradation".
So if my 2024 MME has a LFP battery, why would Ford still tell me to set 90% charging targets? Why wouldn't they limit that recommendation to models with Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) lithium-ion batteries? (my understanding: the Mach-E had NMC before the 2024 model year)
The same article then goes on to quote this study from mid 2023
https://insideevs.com/news/683961/fast-charging-vs-slow-charging-study-ev-range-degradation/
which found that frequent DC fast charging actually does not lead to worse degradation than very infrequent use of it.
My conclusion is, I can fast-charge all I want and I can always charge to 100% (assuming I believe that the "current scientific state" won't be significantly altered by future studies of the same issue). Anyone disagree?
I'm curious how people feel about charging. I had read high level that DC fast charging causes battery to degrade faster over time, so I was prepared to use super chargers sparingly.
Then I was surprised that, additionally to that limitation, Ford recommends only charging to 90% as standard practice. And to only go for 100% charge "when I really need the range for a long road trip". That seemed odd and counter-intuitive to me.
Not to mention it causes a really bad aftertaste from EV marketing if you actually only get the "max range" by risking your battery life long-term!
But then I did some research and it turns out that this article from early 2024
https://insideevs.com/news/707538/recharge-ev-after-every-trip-video/
suggests that "Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) can be regularly recharged to 100% without worrying about degradation".
So if my 2024 MME has a LFP battery, why would Ford still tell me to set 90% charging targets? Why wouldn't they limit that recommendation to models with Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) lithium-ion batteries? (my understanding: the Mach-E had NMC before the 2024 model year)
The same article then goes on to quote this study from mid 2023
https://insideevs.com/news/683961/fast-charging-vs-slow-charging-study-ev-range-degradation/
which found that frequent DC fast charging actually does not lead to worse degradation than very infrequent use of it.
My conclusion is, I can fast-charge all I want and I can always charge to 100% (assuming I believe that the "current scientific state" won't be significantly altered by future studies of the same issue). Anyone disagree?
Sponsored