While I'm not expecting a jump to 326, I wouldn't completely rule it out either.While we don't know the final EPA numbers for the Mach E, and they might increase slightly, the Model Y will have more range for sure.
That doesn't agree with my 2 years of ownership and 30,000 miles of 70MPH highway driving whatsoever, but each person's driving style is their own.Speaking as someone who has owned a Model 3 for 2.5 years you won’t get close to Tesla’s claimed range. I’m hoping Ford is more accurate but the only way you will get close with a Model 3 is to drive under 50 or 60 with no climate control. In freezing temps expect less than half.
At 70 MPH, that would effectively be an increase. The 270/300 targets now are for EPA projections, which is only at 48 MPH avg. For it to stay there at 70 MPH, EPA would probably be around 330/300.I am expecting about 270 for AWD ER and maybe 298 for RWD ER at about 70 mph with reasonable conditions and reasonable driving skills. T
That concerned me a little too. Also the Ford mobile charger (went from 22 miles each hour to 21). It's possible that's because of charger loss instead of vehicle mileage, but if the latter, miles/kWh could have shrunk ~5%.The miles of range per hour of charge on the provided mobile EVSE and Ford Connected box is a start.
You're picking one measurement to claim the Y sacrifices interior space.
Depending on individual need, it is completely appropriate to compare the 3 and the E.
Nope. You are comparing apples and oranges and I am done listening to this insanity.