nvabill
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2021
- Threads
- 57
- Messages
- 2,375
- Reaction score
- 1,907
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Va.
- Vehicles
- F-150, '22 California Route 1
- Thread starter
- #16
The AWD CyberWedgie tows 11,000 pounds but doesn't come with a spare. Anyone towing long distances will want to add the $1,250 spare tire that takes up much of the bed and knocks about 100# off the 2,500# payload as well as reducing towing capacity.They do, are you sure about that? The Lightning doesn’t tow as much or get that range.
Check the Build & Price tool: you can order a Lightning Pro right now.You cant order a Pro, the XLT is $56k and well over 300 miles of range. Like others have said, that 250 mile range is likely 230 or less using Elon EPA number.
Now there is a new concept, people buying a truck for attention, I can't believe anyone would do such a thing!I feel like the Cybertruck is only for people who really want attention. It's only gotten progressively uglier over the years since the announcement IMHO.
But, the question is will this apply to the Cyber Truck who has 800 volt architecture versus every other Tesla running 400 volts?As for range, the AWD CyberWedgie gets 340 Tesla miles. The Extended Range Lightning gets 320 miles.
RWD CyberWedgie only gets 250 Tesla miles.
Tesla is notorious for overestimating their range.
Most likely. It's really a matter of Tesla squeezing the 5-cycle test to give them every mile they can possible claim.But, the question is will this apply to the Cyber Truck who has 800 volt architecture versus every other Tesla running 400 volts?
We all did but those cars were nothing like the Cybertruck or Lightning or other $80K BEVs. There are still cars under $30K. They are called Honda Civics, Ford Mavericks and used vehicles ?. Oh and I think I can technically toss the Bolt in their too.$79k? Holy cow. I liked cars better when they started under $30k...
I think one reason is that it’s easier to approach profitability in a larger, upscale EV than it is in an econobox.Just one dumb old man's opinion, but I'm not seeing logic in the Cybertruck. Not seeing much logic either in the Hummer EV, Lightning, or Silverado.
We should have been giving people little economy cars first.
The argument is that it helps overall to get the biggest, most destructive vehicles off the road first.
Not sure I buy into that.
The Tesla semi makes a little more sense, but the ultimate solution for the most part is going to be to stop the delay improving the US rail system. We can argue how much money the Tesla semi saves us, but it is even heavier and more destructive to the roadways than a conventional semi.
Didn't we all but, thats not what American consumers want, we want big and expensive! $$$$ ?$79k? Holy cow. I liked cars better when they started under $30k...
Bingo, all the manufacturers are doing that, higher profit margin!I think one reason is that it’s easier to approach profitability in a larger, upscale EV than it is in an econobox.
You have to be careful with the online inventory search. Even fleet orders will show up.I checked inventory yesterday. There are about 38 Pros near me within a 100-mile range.