MyTH
Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2021
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 23
- Location
- Boston Area
- Vehicles
- MME, Bolt EUV, Model Y, Lightning
- Thread starter
- #1
Most EV enthusiasts eagerly await the availability of improved charging infrastructure. A few of us try to pitch in and do something about it. Our family business has a small parking lot in the center of town, and we thought it would be a nice gesture to install a DC Fast Charger, devoting one parking space to public EV charging.
Have you thought about what it takes to purchase and install DCFC equipment? There are lots of details, like figuring out how to get your local electric utility to deliver the 3-phase 480 VAC input power you are probably going to need, but let's start with some options for the charging hardware itself:
It's easy to look down your nose at the Bosch/Delta 25 kW DCFC units that many car dealers have. That's not really even a fast charger, right? So really, in order to be considered legitimate, you're looking at around $30k for the charging station (plus a bunch of site work and installation).
A year or two ago, a 50 kW charger seemed like plenty, given that the non-Tesla US EV market was dominated by the likes of the Chevy Bolt EV and the Nissan LEAF. Those vehicles could only charge at around 50 kW anyway, so why spend the money to put in a more powerful charging station? Today, the market has changed. It would be great to offer appropriate charging for the Mustang Mach-E and the F-150 Lightning. Since drivers of those vehicles would probably be disappointed with 50 kW, maybe it's worth an extra $15k to be able to offer them 120 kW charging, right?
Hold on, not so fast! In that price range, we're still looking at CCS1 charging cables that are limited to 200A. The Ford vehicles use 400V batteries, which may be at a somewhat lower voltage (350V?) when discharged. So, spending that extra $15k for the 120 kW charging station will only get you to around 70 kW (200A * 350V), if you're charging a Ford. Your fancy 120 kW station can get to 120 kW only by charging two vehicles at once or by charging at 600V or higher -- meaning the likes of Hyundai/Kia and Porsche. There aren't a whole lot of 800V vehicles on the road yet, and hitting the 120 kW only once or twice a month would incur higher demand charges on top of the higher purchase price and installation (bigger conduit, higher-gauge wire, bigger transformer, etc.).
Ford is a major EV player. If Ford were using an 800V architecture, it would make more sense to install a 120 kW charging station. As things stand, you'd have to go to a liquid-cooled CCS cable to reach 120 kW, which greatly increases the cost and requires additional maintenance. Much has been written about how vehicle manufacturers should go to 800V in order to reach charging speeds of around 350 kW -- and I guess that's true, with liquid-cooled charging cables that can handle 400-500A. Folks don't seem to realize the advantage of 800V in the low-end space, enabling 120 kW charging speed without the unwieldy thick or liquid-cooled cable.
This week, I'm grappling with a decision. Having been awarded a state grant to help with the first $30k (from the Massachusetts share of the VW Dieselgate settlement, same pot of money that started Electrify America), is it worth the extra out-of-pocket cost to install a more-powerful charging station, or do we settle for 50-60 kW?
- M
Have you thought about what it takes to purchase and install DCFC equipment? There are lots of details, like figuring out how to get your local electric utility to deliver the 3-phase 480 VAC input power you are probably going to need, but let's start with some options for the charging hardware itself:
DC Power Output | Approximate Cost |
25 kW | $12,000 |
50 - 60 kW | $30,000 |
120 - 150 kW | $45,000 |
120+ kW with liquid-cooled CCS cable | $65,000 |
It's easy to look down your nose at the Bosch/Delta 25 kW DCFC units that many car dealers have. That's not really even a fast charger, right? So really, in order to be considered legitimate, you're looking at around $30k for the charging station (plus a bunch of site work and installation).
A year or two ago, a 50 kW charger seemed like plenty, given that the non-Tesla US EV market was dominated by the likes of the Chevy Bolt EV and the Nissan LEAF. Those vehicles could only charge at around 50 kW anyway, so why spend the money to put in a more powerful charging station? Today, the market has changed. It would be great to offer appropriate charging for the Mustang Mach-E and the F-150 Lightning. Since drivers of those vehicles would probably be disappointed with 50 kW, maybe it's worth an extra $15k to be able to offer them 120 kW charging, right?
Hold on, not so fast! In that price range, we're still looking at CCS1 charging cables that are limited to 200A. The Ford vehicles use 400V batteries, which may be at a somewhat lower voltage (350V?) when discharged. So, spending that extra $15k for the 120 kW charging station will only get you to around 70 kW (200A * 350V), if you're charging a Ford. Your fancy 120 kW station can get to 120 kW only by charging two vehicles at once or by charging at 600V or higher -- meaning the likes of Hyundai/Kia and Porsche. There aren't a whole lot of 800V vehicles on the road yet, and hitting the 120 kW only once or twice a month would incur higher demand charges on top of the higher purchase price and installation (bigger conduit, higher-gauge wire, bigger transformer, etc.).
Ford is a major EV player. If Ford were using an 800V architecture, it would make more sense to install a 120 kW charging station. As things stand, you'd have to go to a liquid-cooled CCS cable to reach 120 kW, which greatly increases the cost and requires additional maintenance. Much has been written about how vehicle manufacturers should go to 800V in order to reach charging speeds of around 350 kW -- and I guess that's true, with liquid-cooled charging cables that can handle 400-500A. Folks don't seem to realize the advantage of 800V in the low-end space, enabling 120 kW charging speed without the unwieldy thick or liquid-cooled cable.
This week, I'm grappling with a decision. Having been awarded a state grant to help with the first $30k (from the Massachusetts share of the VW Dieselgate settlement, same pot of money that started Electrify America), is it worth the extra out-of-pocket cost to install a more-powerful charging station, or do we settle for 50-60 kW?
- M
Sponsored