My 2018 Bolt with 24,000 miles and 2 years and 8 months of driving has averaged 4.57 mi/Kw-Hr. Based on the size and weight of the Mach-e with ER & AWD I will be OK with 3.5.
Wow that goes to show you if you drive 60-65MPH on the freeway you can get 3.96miles/kWh .. nice for them long runs between chargers
what is your usable battery capacity?
I'm not sure this is correct but what I did was divide the kWhr used by the % Battery remaining. But since I always had the "Hill Reserve" on I then divided that value by the End % Charge. Using this I got
Well the format is distance traveled % by kWh used for real world,
Where was it indicated how fast theog.ho was driving?
Does anyone know what the date at the very bottom of the window sticker means. Mine shows 12/12/2020. Would this be the delivery date or maybe the shipping date. My dealer advised it is supposed to be in Montreal on Dec 15 for me.All, my Route 1 went "to plant" yesterday, and today I have a window sticker. Of significant interest is that it doesn't say "do not ship", and it HAS the section on fuel economy and range (305mi) filled in. It not as good as I hoped the Aero wheels would give it, but that is probably due to Ford's conservative fudge factor on the dyno.
Whatis your dealer saying about this?
I can see down playing epa window stickers but see no logical reason for down playing EPA 2 cycle dyna numbers. Current facts are the EPA sticker of the MME 4X is inflated based on the current EPA 2 cycle dyna numbers and a 0.756 scalar is required to get 270 mi out of them. Funny game if they are actually playing it. Wonder what the reasoning is as most people look at the window sticker and have no knowledge of dyna scores or how they factor in. Unless they release new EPA dyna numbers (not some number slapped on a windows sticker) I have seen no facts regarding conservatism just speculation. Hope your right but I have assumed not and am still of the opinion it will suit our needs.All, my Route 1 went "to plant" yesterday, and today I have a window sticker. Of significant interest is that it doesn't say "do not ship", and it HAS the section on fuel economy and range (305mi) filled in. It not as good as I hoped the Aero wheels would give it, but that is probably due to Ford's conservative fudge factor on the dyno.
are you asking about the New Jersey eligible car or about the car in general??....as far as the NJ stuff, even though I like the dealer (the manager I have been dealing with), I had to tell them about the $5000 incentive and the no sales tax for cars under $55000, so I am waiting to deal with the other frustrations until closer to delivery.....
What? Where are you getting that from?
Neither.Does anyone know what the date at the very bottom of the window sticker means. Mine shows 12/12/2020. Would this be the delivery date or maybe the shipping date. My dealer advised it is supposed to be in Montreal on Dec 15 for me.
Link The gov site. The thread here. EVmodeler
Yes, and that form was an early one just for emissions, not mileage - that thread's initial premise has been debunked.Link The gov site. The thread here. EVmodeler
Plays better in my head for the numbers to calculate to 290 and then slap 270 on the sticker. It is possible that EPA is preoccupied and it did not play out as planed? Always better guessing when time will tell.
That is the date that you are looking at it. It has zero valueDoes anyone know what the date at the very bottom of the window sticker means. Mine shows 12/12/2020. Would this be the delivery date or maybe the shipping date. My dealer advised it is supposed to be in Montreal on Dec 15 for me.
