Tesla Slashes Prices

Ghost Ryder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
2,376
Location
LA
Vehicles
Tesla MYP, 22 GTPE
Country flag
I think all his numbers are off. There is no fricking way a GT PE gets 3.5 mi/kWh. I think I saw 3.0 mi/kWh ONCE. My running average was 2.5 mi/kWh with 80% highway at ~70mph.

MYLR isn't getting 4.0-4.5mi/kWh... that's Model 3 efficiency. It's closer to 3.6-3.8 mi/kWh at 70mph.
I have those exact numbers. I’m at 2.5 for my GTPE over 20kmiles.
my MYP is 3.8 also over 20k miles.
Sponsored

 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
or advertising 480 hp. But leaving out that you only get it for 5secs. Hmmm. Truth in advertising.
This is a silly complaint / argument. ICE vehicles only have their peak power at a specific point in the RPM band.
 

Ghost Ryder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
2,376
Location
LA
Vehicles
Tesla MYP, 22 GTPE
Country flag
I think carmakers are pumping out too many cars for the current demand which is why EV days supply of cars is 75 (trucks are far worse at 120-150 days). Telsa will cut prices further IMO and other carmakers will follow suit because demand is softening.

More deals like $17.5K off Volvo C40s leases and $600/months leases on $110K+ Mercedes EQSes will appear.

BCF0AB3F-BA51-464F-8E02-505E17AC0FFC.jpeg
Can’t wait. Needs to bring prices down.
 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
are you claiming that Teslas are not more efficient than cars that use resistive heaters and that heat pump don’t help with efficiency?
That's a nice stawman you have there.

Teslas are efficient because they're made out of tinfoil and shaped like bars of soap.

Actual testing of Teslas (M3?) pre and post Heat Pump have shown negligible improvements.
 

voxel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Nelson
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,032
Reaction score
1,858
Location
Altamonte Springs, FL
Vehicles
22 Mach-E 4X, 23 GC Limited
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
Actual testing of Teslas (M3?) pre and post Heat Pump have shown negligible improvements.
Actually I don't think what you said is true. Bjorn's detailed tests over the last few years has pre and post heat pump and there is a significant jump in efficiency.

Now if folks are referencing the incompetent study by Consumer Reports.. sure. That basically is some hand-wavy study.
 


theduke

Banned
Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
91
Reaction score
26
Location
California
Vehicles
2013 Model S x 2
Country flag
This is a silly complaint / argument. ICE vehicles only have their peak power at a specific point in the RPM band.
No, it's not silly. Not when the direct competition doesn't limit power after 5 seconds.
 

theduke

Banned
Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
91
Reaction score
26
Location
California
Vehicles
2013 Model S x 2
Country flag
That's a nice stawman you have there.

Teslas are efficient because they're made out of tinfoil and shaped like bars of soap.

Actual testing of Teslas (M3?) pre and post Heat Pump have shown negligible improvements.
Ok, now you just sound like a Tesla hater.

If they were made of tinfoil, they would not have the highest crash ratings score of every location (USA, EU, and China) of any car in their class.

And actual tests pre and post heat-pump show that in cold weather when the resistive heater would be on, the heat pump makes a marked improvement. Mild (70s F) weather, not much.
 

Ghost Ryder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
2,376
Location
LA
Vehicles
Tesla MYP, 22 GTPE
Country flag
This is a silly complaint / argument. ICE vehicles only have their peak power at a specific point in the RPM band.
That's right, ICE car can maintain max power until they run out of gas as long as they keep the RPM at the peak. The MachE loses power quickly after 5 seconds, even if you don't keep on accelerating.

So what was your point again?
 

devmach-e

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
2,021
Reaction score
2,476
Location
SF Bay Area
Vehicles
2022 Premium RWD ER, 2016 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
Occupation
Unix Sysadmin
Country flag
That’s what I’m saying. Their epa range is higher than their real range.
"Real range" is hard to quantify in a laboratory setting. Everyone's driving patterns are different. The EPA range was never meant to be a guarantee of what someone will achieve. It, along with MPG numbers for ICE powered vehicles, is meant to be a comparison tool to allow consumers to look at two comparable cars and see how efficient they are. It allows them to pick the more "fuel efficient" car.
 

Ghost Ryder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
1,900
Reaction score
2,376
Location
LA
Vehicles
Tesla MYP, 22 GTPE
Country flag
That's a nice stawman you have there.

Teslas are efficient because they're made out of tinfoil and shaped like bars of soap.

Actual testing of Teslas (M3?) pre and post Heat Pump have shown negligible improvements.
Here's test that shows that the heat pump is 3x as efficient as resistive heaters in the model 3.
https://electrek.co/2020/12/03/tesla-model-3-heat-pump-comparison-results/

I'm going to assume that if energy is not used for heating, it can be used for range.
 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
Actually I don't think what you said is true. Bjorn's detailed tests over the last few years has pre and post heat pump and there is a significant jump in efficiency.

Now if folks are referencing the incompetent study by Consumer Reports.. sure. That basically is some hand-wavy study.
You're talking about the test where he parked 2 cars at above-freezing temps?

I had to go back to the video and he saved 1.4kw over 3 hours of use. Even if you don't factor in the 2019 vs 2021 model year differences (age, battery health, double pane windows, etc.) you can figure out how many extra miles 1.4kw gets you (in a best case scenario for the heat pump).

I think the CR test lays out a clear picture. Both the MY and Mach-E get 68% of their warm weather range in the winter (unless you want to use Telsa's bogus EPA #'s....then it's even worse).

https://www.consumerreports.org/car...e-affects-electric-vehicle-range-a4873569949/

Ford Mustang Mach-E Tesla Slashes Prices efficiency
 

devmach-e

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
2,021
Reaction score
2,476
Location
SF Bay Area
Vehicles
2022 Premium RWD ER, 2016 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
Occupation
Unix Sysadmin
Country flag
So if every car company uses a lower results test, and one company uses a higher results test, then yes nothing was done wrong. For that one company and all its minions to go on and on about how the car has SO much range IS WRONG, truth in advertising would be acknowledging they use a different test so results may vary....
On the Monroney sticker where the range or MPG figure is published, is a disclaimer that basically states your results may vary due to a variety of factors.
 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
No, it's not silly. Not when the direct competition doesn't limit power after 5 seconds.
No, it shows a lack of understanding for how HP is measured in every vehicle.
Sponsored

 
 







Top