mkhuffman
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2020
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 6,875
- Reaction score
- 9,507
- Location
- Virginia
- Vehicles
- 2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Merry Christmas to you also, Lee!120V Departure Time Preconditioning:
While still plugged into 120V at my 85% charge limit, I ended up setting two departure times (DTs) in a row, one at 18:30 and one at 20:30, cabin temperature Medium. On all the graphs, the light blue vertical lines represent the departure times as a reference mark. During both departure times, heater power was limited to only 1 kW (same as 120V input power) compared to the usual 5-6 kW, so performance was slow. Both departure times lasted a total of 80 minutes. It's clear departure times are meant to only use energy from the wall rather than taking any energy from the pack. The temporal structure of a departure time program is as follows:
The preceding heating times vary depending on how cold it is outside (longer when colder). My garage temp was about 21ÂșF.
- Heat battery pack (35 min)
- Heat cabin (30 min)
- Departure time
- Continue to heat cabin (15 min)
First let's look at cabin temperature performance:
![]()
Remember the battery pack is being heated for the first 35 minutes of the DT, so the cabin temperature does not increase until midway through the DT periods (marked in orange). As you can see, the cabin temperature only reached 42ÂșF at the first 120V departure time, and only 48ÂșF during the second DT. That's not very warm as a result of the 1 kW heater limitation. The cabin continues to heat for 15 minutes after the DT before turning off. For comparison, I performed a 15 min remote start (RS) immediately after DT #2 lapsed. This time full heater power was used, and you can see the difference in the speed of the temp rise, eventually reaching 76ÂșF before timing out. Whereas the departure times did not really deplete the battery, the 15 min remote start drained the battery by 1% to 84%. The remote start required 40 minutes of L1 charging afterwards to return to 85%.
Now let's look at battery heating during 120V DTs:
![]()
Again, light blue lines mark the set departure times. Red line is the coolant heater power, you can see that's flat at about 1 kW during the entire DT. The green line is the pack coolant inlet temp (CIT), you can see that rising the first ~30 min of the DT as the pack heats. CIT then starts decreasing when heating switches to to the cabin. Just like the previous test, pack heating performance was very poor at only 1 kW. During the first DT pack temp only increased 3ÂșC, 4ÂșC during the second DT. It seems the first DT wasn't long enough to get the pack warmed to 5ÂșC, so it appears to be running into a maximum time constraint.
Next let's look at energy use:
![]()
Same red line for heater power. EVSE input is the blue line, you can see that's barely higher than the heater power. Green is the battery power, positive values indicate discharge. A small amount of power was being drawn from the pack at times, with a larger peak around the departure time. I think this is the heated seats and steering wheel turning on. There are also some exterior running light loads that come in as well. The heated seats run full blast for 10 minutes, before dropping down to a lower power.
Last let's look at total battery SoC and energy:
![]()
This is somewhat interesting and is a good illustration of why heating the pack helps range. The red line is the estimated total pack energy (kWh) from the BMS, the green line is the the exact SoC. You can see that when heating the pack, the SoC actually goes down 1% while the total energy goes up 3.5 kWh. How does the pack energy go up if the SoC is dropping? The pack holds more energy when warm, and more energy can also be extracted while warm, which explains the trends. Heating the pack does not give you free energy, it just unlocks more available energy that's already in the pack.
If I go back and include the data from the previous test:
If you extrapolate that to a full winter pack warmup (-15ÂșC to 15ÂșC) the effective range increase for warming a cold pack could be up to 40 miles. You will also have a higher power limit (less gray jail bars) and acceleration with a warm pack.
- Pack temp increased 11ÂșC (-6Âș C to 5ÂșC)
- Pack energy increased 6 kWh (57.4 to 63.4 kWh)
- Range increased 12 miles
Findings:
Conclusions:
- 120V departure time preconditioning DOES heat the pack, albeit VERY SLOWLY
- Departure times do not deplete pack energy
- Heater limited to 1 kW on 120V
- Battery heats up only 3-4ÂșC per 120V departure time
- Will not be fully warmed in one cycle
- Cabin warms up only 15ÂșF per 120V departure time
- Cabin may not be warm enough
- Remote start heats up the cabin much faster than 120V departure times
- Uses full heater power and depletes the pack slightly
- Does not heat the battery
If you use 120V charging, remember to ALWAYS PLUG IN to keep the battery warm in the cold. You need as much time plugged in as you can get.
- 120V departure times DO heat the battery, but barely
- 1kW is not enough power to heat the pack or the cabin in a reasonable amount of time
- The cabin and pack are not fully warmed up after a 120V DT
- A remote start (or two) right after a 120V DT seems to be a good strategy to get the cabin fully warm
- Set the Departure Time 30 mins before you leave, remote start 15 mins before you leave
- Due to poor 120V heating performance, a 240V EVSE is strongly recommended for winter climates so you get full-power heating.
- Setting a 120V DT is better than nothing, but not by much.
? Merry Christmas! ?
BTW - if I read correctly, all your testing was done with the target charge reached, so no battery charging was happening. If that is correct, if you plug into L1 with a battery that needs to be charged, will the charging process supersede the preconditioning process?
I assume that is why we previously thought no preconditioning would happen on L1. The charging speed is so slow, it really cannot add charge to the battery and precondition at the same time, so it prioritizes charging. That is what most of us would want it to do, I think.
Sponsored