Yeah, with those recalls you’ll only know if you effed up not doing them when you get messed up in a car crash. Definitely a good call.I haven't done any recall stuff including the windows/roof. I haven't had any problems.
So Ford will reimburse me for the HVBJB I had installed on my own dime? I will have to look into that, thanks.Are you talking about this??
"Ford provided the general reimbursement plan for the cost of remedies paid for by vehicle owners prior to notification of a safety recall in May 2023. The ending date for reimbursement eligibility is estimated to be March 31, 2024."
That only refers to any customer that had to pay for replacement prior to the recall being issued.
I haven't done any recall stuff including the windows/roof. I haven't had any problems.
It's real concerning when people think that because they can't see a defective installation that all is well.Yeah, with those recalls you’ll only know if you effed up not doing them when you get messed up in a car crash. Definitely a good call.
Thank you for a reasoned analysis of the recall. Your opinions appear justified and accurate based on the evidence presented, and explain multiple behaviors that have been well-documented on this site and others.OK, I had time to review the NHTSA documents for 23V-687 / 23S56 and give my opinions.
While the original was FWD it was always targeting 300 miles of range, so the larger battery pack would have been needed to get that range, like wise the larger motor probably would have been used, just with the max power potentially dialed back a bit.I think ford designed the insides of this car for the small battery pack and RWD and then decided to go mustang route and then added the big pack and gt motors.
I wouldn't count on it since you had yours replaced proactively while your car is still under warranty. Doesn't hurt to ask though.So Ford will reimburse me for the HVBJB I had installed on my own dime? I will have to look into that, thanks.
Your position assumes the root cause is an engineering/design issue as opposed to a manufacturing defect in the contactors.While the original was FWD it was always targeting 300 miles of range, so the larger battery pack would have been needed to get that range, like wise the larger motor probably would have been used, just with the max power potentially dialed back a bit.
The mustangification just allowed for a sportier looking dress along with the option for a higher performance orientated trim, however based on the performance of the GTs they failed miserably on that front.
This is just a classic case of Fords it will do attitude , when it comes to certain parts selection where either bean counters dictate the part or the engineers don't do the intensive testing. With the final shake down development of the mach-e happening during covid I suspect very minimal real world testing was actually done.
If the only people getting the issues was a subset of GT owners with fists of ham and feet of lead then you could possibly see it not getting caught in testing but this has happened to all trims with just regular use and at minimal mileage. It should have been caught and found in testing long before the vehicle ended up in owners hands.
It took them 10 days to do,the 22S41. Not looking forward to this one.Once this recall is released, I wonder what that is going to do to the wait times at most dealers for EV work. I also wonder how many dealers will say, "We don't have the staff/tools" for the recall and advise going to another dealer.
The wording in the NHTSA document leans toward “yes”.I wouldn't count on it since you had yours replaced proactively while your car is still under warranty. Doesn't hurt to ask though.
Blasphemy! Nothing is almost as good as the first cup of coffee! It’s Newton’s or Einstein’s First Rule of the universe or something.It's almost as good as that first cup of coffee
We? No. But the NTHSA isn’t interested in an absolute zero failure rate as that’s unrealistic. They’re after a very low failure rate, most likely quite significantly lower than the current rate.Do we know that all of the 107 failures with loss of motive power after completion of 22S41 were from the original HVBJB?
Currently, the failures only create a demand for fairly limited number of parts. This version of the recall creates an instant demand for an extra 30,000 parts. Plus the parts for continued production etc. it takes time.why did Ford tell the dealers to wait until Ford provided parts ordering information before any new cars subject to the recall could be delivered to customers?
Yeah, there are dealers who are incapable of scheduling a tire rotation before May 2024, let alone a bunch of HVBJB replacements.Thanks! I knew that could not be right and that I must be misinterpreting things. That was referring to something else.
The morning bowl of kibble is better than any cup of coffee! Chow time rox!Blasphemy! Nothing is almost as good as the first cup of coffee! It’s Newton’s or Einstein’s First Rule of the universe or something.
<SNIP>
Interesting this is exactly what they have done in Germany for years.Wow and I thought I would be safe. My FE is in the list but after getting two speed camera tickets within 15 minutes from the same camera (epic fail on my part), I have to be good for the next 12 months.
For those unaware, speed cameras in AZ come with 3 points per offense and are moving violations by law. They yank your license at 8!! I got one removed in a five hour online class, but I live in an area with mobile cameras and insanely low speed limits. No joy for me right now…