The other thing to keep in mind is improvements in battery density or reduction in problematic battery contents often don't result in reduced cost. The result is we will see high density solutions such as solid state batteries sooner in high-price vehicles, while cheaper battery technology will flow from high-price toward low-price vehicles.+1
Remember, the promise that was stated and re-stated multiple times was < $100 / KW by this year (https://cleantechnica.com/2018/06/0...his-year-100-kwh-tesla-battery-packs-in-2020/). Tesla is somewhere around $150 / KW.
Battery tech is hard. If you go back and dig through the details of the battery day, the 56% comes from optimizations at EVERY STEP from the mine to the end consumer vehicle. Tesla doesn't control mining today, nor do they control all of the battery market today. In fact if you view the presentation again, Tesla themselves will only be capable of producing 150 GW of batteries years from now, they are relying on the TW numbers to be hit by suppliers (which at least partly are out of their control).
I think that battery day was awesome, don't get me wrong. We need this kind of forward-thinking to push BEV tech. But, to say 3 years from now Tesla will have their own mining operation, and their own cathode plant, and that they will redefine the smelting process and other processes such as dry media application. That's a stretch to say the least. 5 years would be minimum, with 10 years probably being the maximum. I hope I'm wrong here, but history would be on the conservative side.
KING RANCH3 years. By then Ford will have already released the Mach E GT Performance Shelby JBL Triple Platinum Edition.