DevSecOps
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Todd
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
- Threads
- 69
- Messages
- 4,764
- Reaction score
- 11,624
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Vehicles
- '21 Audi SQ5 / '23 Rivian R1T / '23 M3P
- Occupation
- CISO
This is all so wrong in many ways...folks that are hanging their hopes on NHTSA resolving product merchantability and fitness issues around the HVBJB failures are going to be sorely disappointed.
the "S" in NHTSA stand for safety (not product liability) and the key sentence in their notice is:
also notice that there are only 12 "complaints" in the report summary. no other specific report types (crash/fire, injuries, etc) but 44 "others" which are nebulous "Early Warning Reporting Field Reports". the lack of actual crashes, fires, and injuries is good in general but also shows it may not be a "safety" issue that will go as far as requiring physical fix or replacement.
so, they will be investigating the safety aspects and determine next steps if warranted. we may never see the details.
if y'all would send in actual documented complaints they would have more to go on. hate to break it to you but complaining on MachEForum doesn't count. ?
First, there's a lot more than 12 that they are investigating. 12 just initiated a renewed interest. You'll see the TBD under manufacturer. Once the investigation team gets more data from Ford this TBD should be updated to a fairly large number.
Second, yes they are taking failure as a safety issue. This is because some people have lost motive power on the freeway. It isn't the job of NHTSA to redesign the part, it's their job to ensure Ford remedies the safety aspect. They entrusted them the first time and found that they might have been bit in the ass. Could that mean another software update, sure it could, but it could also mean a new part and replacements. Once the investigation is complete we will know. The safety aspect was investigated the first time and found to be a legit issue. There's no need to re-investigate that. This is not a new investigation into a new issue. It's an investigation in the adequacy of the original recall.
Third, Federal DOT (NHTSA) investigators have reached out to people on this forum. Posting stuff here does get noticed especially when forum posts are referenced in formal complaints.
Lastly, when this recall first hit the forum was filled with Fanboys and skeptics alike. It was very contentious. Some people attempted to gather together members to file NHTSA complaints but it was often met with discouragement and negativity (here's one example).
Sponsored
Last edited: