louc757
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Lou
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2022
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 127
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Vehicles
- 23 MME GTPE Rapid Red Nite Pony, 2024 Silverado 2500
- Occupation
- Pilot
Thanks for doing this test. I have a 23 MME, and have not received any OTA updates, so I wasn't sure if i had preconditioning or not. My car was built on 11/9/22, Sync Rev 592, Ver 22280 or 10/7/22. I wasn't able to find the exact charger I wanted to go to in the Ford Nav app because there are many in Cincinatti, so I picked one that looked close. It was a cold day (for Kentucky anyway) at about 25 deg F. Battery was about 40 deg F driving from Louisville to Cincy. As I got within 20 miles, battery started heating. I had the heat off since it was a sunny day, and wanted to see how fast a warm battery will charge at.En-Route Battery Preconditioning for DCFC
Today's test is the new en-route battery preconditioning feature introduced in Power-Up 3.6.2. The idea is to heat the battery while you drive to the charger so it can accept charge at a higher rate. You must select a DC charger in the Ford Nav and be within 30 km (19 mi) of it before preconditioning will occur.
To set the stage here, it's a below 0ÂșF day here. I Level 2 charged all day at work, and even though I was charging the battery still cooled off to -8ÂșC (18ÂșF) by quitting time. I input the local EA station into the nav, and I heard the battery heating start. However it shut off shortly after taking off. Because it's so cold, the cabin heater was taking too much power and preconditioning was cancelled. Bummer. Until I had the bright idea of turning OFF HVAC. Well, that worked, fired the battery heating right up.
Now a normal person probably would have called it quits after a few minutes of no cabin heat in these pleasant -19ÂșC (-2ÂșF) temps, but I'm not normal. Yes, I suffered for science ? in order to see how long it would take to heat the battery up for DCFC, and how high it would go. The short answer is it took AN HOUR AT FULL HEATER OUTPUT to reach the 26ÂșC target temp for DCFC. An hour seems much longer when you're freezing. To get around the 30 km geofence limitation, I drove in circles on the highways surrounding the charger. I could have parked it and went inside, but I wanted the airflow under the pack to simulate real-world cooling effects on a highway. BTW, to avoid the windows fogging up, you need some air movement, so I ended up setting the cabin temp on LO with the fan on speed 1. That disables cabin heat and blows raw outside air at you. That helped make a pretty graph that wasn't disrupted by repeated defrost cycles, and it also helped the cabin cool down to 15ÂșF while I was driving. I was very happy to see the heater finally shut off, and immediately switched the cabin heat back on as I made my way to the EA station for DCFC.
So let's take a look at the temperature graph:
![]()
Focus on the blue line which is the main pack temp. In 61 minutes it went from -8ÂșC (18ÂșF) to 26ÂșC (79ÂșF). The heater output started at 6.2 kW and gradually declined to 5.6 kW (this is the PTC effect as the coolant return temp increases). Keep in mind this graph really represents the fastest you could possibly heat the battery in these conditions, the amount of heat available with the HVAC on simultaneously will be quite a bit less. If the HVAC was on at the same time, pack heating likely would have taken two hours and would have run into a wall before reaching 26ÂșC. Perhaps it would have only reached 5ÂșC. This is why it was disabled due to limited heat reserve. I will need to wait for a warmer day to test battery preconditioning while the cabin heat is still active, but the rate of heating will be significantly less.
Now let's look at the DCFC session at a 150 kW EA station I reached shortly after battery heating finished:
![]()
Temp was down to about -20ÂșC/-4ÂșF when I pulled in. A lot of the chargers were displaying a "power reduced" message. I chose one not displaying the message, and activated with Plug & Charge. However I immediately noticed a 196A max current limitation (blue line), much less than the 350A these stations should be capable of. I wasn't happy with only 62 kW, so I decided to try a different dispenser. This one allowed up to 236A which was an improvement, but still slower than it should be. Not sure how much the cold affects these things. The car was correctly asking for full amperage (red line) at first, but the stations always supply (green line) 10-20 amps less than requested for some reason.
After reaching about 59%, the car decided to start requesting less current from the charger, you can see the red request line start decreasing. This is frustrating because the battery is warm enough and perfectly capable of handling the full 236A all the way up to at least 75-80% SoC. Ford has this weird charging strategy where they set the remainder of the charge curve based on the initial rate. Almost like it's a percentage of the initial rate. This means if you use a slower charging station, it will slow you down that much more for the rest of the curve based on the initial speed. This is totally not necessary, there should be a calculated maximum rate at each % SoC based on the battery temps. When using a slower DCFC station (<80 kW), it should be pegged at maximum output the whole way to 75-80%. At only 218A, no part of the battery should be getting that hot so I just don't see the need to throttle it. Ford should work on this strategy because they are needlessly reducing the charging speeds at lower power DCFC stations.
During the DCFC session, the battery was not heated any more by the PTC heater. I shut HVAC off to make sure, nothing happened. I've seen some cases where it heats more than 26ÂșC after starting a session, the decision to heat more must be tied to the charging power available. In this case heating more wasn't necessary for the speeds I was charging at. Temp increased from 23ÂșC to 26ÂșC on its own during the session (yellow trace at the top).
Findings:
Conclusions:
- Battery took 1 hour to heat from -8ÂșC to 26ÂșC using full 6 kW heater output (34ÂșC/hr)
- Battery heat capacity is 0.18 kWh/ÂșC or 630 kJ/ÂșC
- Preconditioning starts as soon as a DC station within 30 km is selected in the Ford nav
- There is no time limit on battery heating as long as you remain within 30 km of the station
- There is a 26ÂșC upper temp limit
- En-route preconditioning will not occur at extreme cold temps unless you turn off HVAC
- Many EA stations operate with significantly degraded performance
- EA stations output 10-20 amps less than requested by the car
- Additional heating above 26ÂșC while DCFCing is not always commanded
- Ford throttles back the charge rate unnecessarily at lower-amperage DC stations
- The Mach-E needs a dedicated 5 kW battery heater that is not shared with the cabin.
- Battery temp increase will be limited with only a 30 km range limit.
- I think this limit should be increased to 60-120 km to give enough time.
- EA stations are in varying states of disrepair
- Ford should fix unnecessary throttling of low-amp DC stations and allow full current up to 75-80%. The current limit at 50-75% should not be affected by the initial station amperage unless using a high amperage (300+) station.
As I went past the station enroute to the EA station on in Harper's Station, it kept warming. Since I was going on a loop (I-275) and I remained withing 20 miles of the station in the Ford Nav, it kept heating and warmed up to 80.6 deg F. So those with a 23, it looks like battery preconditioning was delivered with the vehicle.
Sponsored