Shayne
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2020
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 3,824
- Reaction score
- 2,738
- Location
- Northern Ontario Canada
- Vehicles
- 2021 MME4x Prem
- Occupation
- Retired
I disagree as it says right in the recall it is the design so for me the speculation on percentage is moot. You are grasping a straws that some were built more robust than designed and hence the design flaw is not as prevalent. That is cutting edge trying to fix a problem with higher mathematics and just does not work. You put it thru some sort of paces it going to happen. Says under designed right in the recall. The PR FAQ is just that. The part-to part variation is just leaving the door open for finger pointing that no longer goes on.I failed to clearly make my point: I suspect that some fraction of the HVBJB have parts that are not as robust due to manufacturing variances and that those parts are not identifiable until they fail or start to fail. Thus, only a portion of the HVBJBs will fail, but impossible to identify at this point.
Again, this is only speculation, but I'm familiar with electrical part variability; every part is slightly different and perhaps some of the parts fell too far off the norm.
"The design and part-to-part variation of the high voltage battery main contactor is not robust to the heat generated"
Sponsored